DIFFERENCES in views, ideas, or opinions should be resolved through dialogue, discussion, and debate. We should not constantly rely on the law to suppress opinions that do not align with our own thinking, perception, or interests. People often have reasons for their views, and it is wiser to engage with them and resolve differences through dialogue rather than using legal measures.

A worrying trend is emerging in our society, where individuals and groups spend time filing reports or complaints with authorities, hoping for legal action against those who express differing views. If this trend continues, we risk creating a society that is unable to think critically or speak freely. In the end, society will suffer, and the country will fail to progress.

We should encourage open expression of ideas without the fear of legal consequences. Instead of constantly using the law to suppress dissent, why don’t we sit down for peaceful dialogue, discussion, and debate to resolve differences? Is it really that hard to have these conversations?

Freedom of speech and expression is a fundamental human right that must always be valued and protected. It is essential for every individual in every country. This freedom should not be denied or restricted without justifiable cause, as it brings many benefits to society and the country.

Freedom of speech and expression allows individuals and communities to express their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal action. It is enshrined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 (UDHR) and recognised in international human rights law through the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966. Article 19 of the UDHR clearly states: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

In Malaysia, freedom of speech is protected under the Federal Constitution. Article 10(1)(a) states: “Every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression.” This clearly shows that this right exists and is legally protected by both international conventions and our own constitution. No one should be denied their freedom of speech and expression.

Each of us is born with our own mind and unique ideas. These differences should be valued as they contribute to societal and national progress. Instead of viewing freedom of speech as a threat, we should see it positively. It allows individuals to protect their own rights and the rights of others, serving as a shield against mistreatment and oppression. Suppressing this freedom limits the ability of people to defend themselves and hampers the development of constructive ideas crucial to the advancement of society.

However, we must acknowledge that no right, including freedom of speech, is absolute. While there are limitations to this freedom, it does not mean we should entirely shut down people’s ability to express their views. Those in power should not exploit these limitations to create laws that discourage free speech. People should be encouraged to speak and express their opinions. Differences should be addressed professionally through dialogue and debate, not through legal action, arrests, fines, or imprisonment. – September 9, 2024.

* Muzaffar Syah Mallow is associate professor at the Faculty of Shariah and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia.
 

* This is the opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insight. Article may be edited for brevity and clarity.